Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 4:01 PM, Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> wrote:
>> On 03/09/2017 12:27 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> For good measure I also added a DEBUG1 log message reporting successful
>>> binding to a port. I'm not sure if there's an argument for putting this
>>> out at LOG level (i.e. by default) --- any thoughts about that?
>> +1 for making it LOG instead of DEBUG1
> I would tend to vote against that, because startup is getting
> gradually chattier and chattier, and I think this isn't likely to be
> of interest to very many people most of the time.
Yeah, my thought was that if we've gotten along without this for 20 years,
it's probably not of interest to most people most of the time.
However, if we're measuring this on a scale of usefulness to the average
DBA, I would argue that it's of more interest than any of these messages
that currently appear by default:
2017-03-09 23:40:12.334 EST  LOG: MultiXact member wraparound protections are now enabled
2017-03-09 23:40:12.335 EST  LOG: autovacuum launcher started
2017-03-09 23:40:12.336 EST  LOG: logical replication launcher started
The first of those is surely past its sell-by date. As for the other two,
we should log *failure* to start, but not the normal case.
regards, tom lane
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Petr Jelinek||Date: 2017-03-10 04:51:59|
|Subject: Re: Logical replication existing data copy|
|Previous:||From: Ashutosh Bapat||Date: 2017-03-10 04:43:22|
|Subject: Re: Parallel Append implementation|