From: | David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Indirect indexes |
Date: | 2017-03-02 14:05:22 |
Message-ID: | 18e59665-67b6-906c-765b-a7b69b42e21a@pgmasters.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi Álvaro,
On 1/31/17 11:54 PM, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 31, 2016 at 7:35 AM, Alvaro Herrera
> <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>> Attached is v4, which fixes a couple of relatively minor bugs. There
>> are still things to tackle before this is committable, but coding review
>> of the new executor node would be welcome.
>
> Moved to CF 2017-03 because of a lack of reviews. The patch fails to
> apply and needs a rebase, so it is marked as "waiting on author".
It looks like we need a rebase if it's going to attract any reviewers.
Might I suggest this patch is not complete enough to be in the last CF
for a release? I know it's been around for a while, but it is a major
feature and the consensus and completeness do not seem to be there.
I would encourage you to move this to 2017-07.
Thanks,
--
-David
david(at)pgmasters(dot)net
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Ronan Dunklau | 2017-03-02 14:30:02 | Questions about MergeAppend |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2017-03-02 13:50:31 | Re: Cost model for parallel CREATE INDEX |