Re: Indirect indexes

From: David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Indirect indexes
Date: 2017-03-02 14:05:22
Message-ID: 18e59665-67b6-906c-765b-a7b69b42e21a@pgmasters.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi Álvaro,

On 1/31/17 11:54 PM, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 31, 2016 at 7:35 AM, Alvaro Herrera
> <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>> Attached is v4, which fixes a couple of relatively minor bugs. There
>> are still things to tackle before this is committable, but coding review
>> of the new executor node would be welcome.
>
> Moved to CF 2017-03 because of a lack of reviews. The patch fails to
> apply and needs a rebase, so it is marked as "waiting on author".

It looks like we need a rebase if it's going to attract any reviewers.

Might I suggest this patch is not complete enough to be in the last CF
for a release? I know it's been around for a while, but it is a major
feature and the consensus and completeness do not seem to be there.

I would encourage you to move this to 2017-07.

Thanks,
--
-David
david(at)pgmasters(dot)net

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ronan Dunklau 2017-03-02 14:30:02 Questions about MergeAppend
Previous Message Robert Haas 2017-03-02 13:50:31 Re: Cost model for parallel CREATE INDEX