| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Chris Hoover <revoohc(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-odbc(at)postgresql(dot)org, Michael Fuhr <mike(at)fuhr(dot)org>, pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: PG 7.3.4 VS PG 8.0.3 Problem |
| Date: | 2005-08-09 20:20:04 |
| Message-ID: | 18731.1123618804@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-admin pgsql-odbc |
Chris Hoover <revoohc(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> This is what is pointing me to a problem with one of the db's. It
> appears that the sqlca code has had to of changed between the 7.3.4
> and 8 code and is now behaving in a different (and unexpected) manner.
There is no "sqlca" in the backend protocol at all, so I really dunno
what is causing the change in behavior.
> BTW, which version is correct? Should a no rows return query give a 0
> or a 100?
I suspect 100 is correct, but you'd have to go read the ODBC spec to
be sure.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Michael Fuhr | 2005-08-09 20:44:08 | Re: PG 7.3.4 VS PG 8.0.3 Problem |
| Previous Message | Chris Hoover | 2005-08-09 20:18:04 | Re: PG 7.3.4 VS PG 8.0.3 Problem |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Michael Fuhr | 2005-08-09 20:44:08 | Re: PG 7.3.4 VS PG 8.0.3 Problem |
| Previous Message | Chris Hoover | 2005-08-09 20:18:04 | Re: PG 7.3.4 VS PG 8.0.3 Problem |