| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Kjetil Torgrim Homme <kjetilho(at)ifi(dot)uio(dot)no> |
| Cc: | pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: PosgreSQL is crashing with a signal 11 - Bug? |
| Date: | 2004-09-10 14:24:00 |
| Message-ID: | 18718.1094826240@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
Kjetil Torgrim Homme <kjetilho(at)ifi(dot)uio(dot)no> writes:
> how can att[i]->attlen possibly change in the interim? but
> data_length looks corrupted, too.
Unless you compiled with no optimization at all (-O0), the compiler
would likely fold the identical memcpy() calls in the different
if-branches together. So I wouldn't put too much stock in the
reported line number.
It does seem striking that a 0x2f got dumped into the high byte of the
length word in both cases. Have you checked to see what the
page-on-disk looks like? I'd be interested to know if the offset of the
damaged byte within the page is again 0x0fff.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | PostgreSQL Bugs List | 2004-09-10 19:14:40 | BUG #1249: pg_restore doesnt handle restoring databases not created as a superuser |
| Previous Message | Kjetil Torgrim Homme | 2004-09-10 12:43:41 | Re: PosgreSQL is crashing with a signal 11 - Bug? |