Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: minor view creation weirdness

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>
Cc: Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>,PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: minor view creation weirdness
Date: 2003-10-03 13:53:22
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au> writes:
>>> I'd almost argue that we should change this message to an error
>> I agree.

> Except that it would totally break backwards-compatibility?

Well, that's a possible problem.  How many such views do you think are
out there, given the existence of the warning?

			regards, tom lane

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Bruno Wolff IIIDate: 2003-10-03 13:57:49
Subject: timestamp.c is broken (probably by ecpg) in 7.4
Previous:From: Michael BrusserDate: 2003-10-03 13:40:50
Subject: Using backslash in query

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2018 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group