| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Justin Clift <justin(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-core(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org, Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net> |
| Subject: | Re: Fwd: RE: PostgreSQL track for PHP Con West |
| Date: | 2003-09-09 02:53:33 |
| Message-ID: | 18248.1063076013@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-www |
"Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org> writes:
> On Mon, 8 Sep 2003, Josh Berkus wrote:
>> Justin,
>>> Most people who signed onto that list did so with the expectation that
>>> it would not have um... non-PostgreSQL related stuff going through it.
>>> To then allow non-PostgreSQL stuff to go through it in this way feels
>>> like it would be a kind of "breech of trust".
>>
>> But this is PostgreSQL related ... there will be two PostgreSQL segments at
>> the convention. And I'll bet that about 1/3 of our users have some
>> involvement with PHP ....
>>
>> Certainly it's as relevant as EMS HiTech's monthly version announcements ...
> Agreed ... and especially considering how hard it is to get 'inroads' into
> the PHP community, being seen as sponsors always helps ...
My thoughts exactly. PHP is relevant to Postgres, and it's in our best
interest to make more people think so ;-). I don't see anything wrong
with occasional PHP-related announcements, if they have any PG connection
at all. Given that there are a couple of PG talks scheduled at this
conference, that would make it reasonable to mention anyway, wouldn't it?
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Justin Clift | 2003-09-09 03:12:15 | Re: Fwd: RE: PostgreSQL track for PHP Con West |
| Previous Message | Marc G. Fournier | 2003-09-09 02:14:14 | Re: Fwd: RE: PostgreSQL track for PHP Con West |