Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Description of SIGHUP GUC parameters

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Description of SIGHUP GUC parameters
Date: 2006-02-08 23:49:35
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-docs
Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> Why not simply use the technical phrase: "SIGHUP" etc. We can just say
> 'these terms are shorthand for "......" '

> I'm not crazy about the terms but at least it is explicit and accurate.
> It would also allow us to have a much longer description of all of the
> implications and difficulties of each mode.

We have all that in the introductory section; the references made in the
per-variable descriptions really have no impact on how verbose the
introductory text is ...

			regards, tom lane

In response to

pgsql-docs by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2006-02-14 04:03:03
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Online backup vs Continuous backup
Previous:From: Simon RiggsDate: 2006-02-08 22:17:56
Subject: Re: Description of SIGHUP GUC parameters

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group