| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Peter Brant" <Peter(dot)Brant(at)wicourts(dot)gov> |
| Cc: | pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [Win32] Problem with rename() |
| Date: | 2006-04-18 19:01:05 |
| Message-ID: | 17802.1145386865@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs pgsql-patches |
I wrote:
> "Peter Brant" <Peter(dot)Brant(at)wicourts(dot)gov> writes:
>> Does that also explain why an attempt to make a new connection just
>> hangs?
> Actually, I was just wondering about that --- seems like a bare
> connection attempt should not generate any WAL entries. Do you have any
> nondefault actions in ~/.psqlrc or something like that?
I just repeated the hangup scenario here, and confirmed that I can still
start and stop a plain-vanilla psql session (no ~/.psqlrc, no special
per-user or per-database settings) without it hanging. I can also do
simple read-only SELECTs. So I'm thinking your hang must involve some
additional non-read-only actions.
[ thinks for awhile longer ... ] No, I take that back. Once you'd
exhausted the current pg_clog page (32K transactions), even read-only
transactions would be blocked by the need to create a new pg_clog page
(which is a WAL-logged action). A read-only transaction never actually
makes a WAL entry, but it does still consume an XID and hence a slot on
the current pg_clog page. So I just hadn't tried enough transactions.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2006-04-18 22:51:43 | Re: problem with kill script |
| Previous Message | Magnus Hagander | 2006-04-18 19:00:54 | Re: Permission denied on fsync / Win32 (was right |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2006-04-19 02:50:24 | Re: bug in windows xp |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2006-04-18 18:44:32 | Re: [Win32] Problem with rename() |