| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Daniel Farina <daniel(at)heroku(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Should we add crc32 in libpgport? |
| Date: | 2012-02-29 00:55:05 |
| Message-ID: | 17778.1330476905@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Daniel Farina <daniel(at)heroku(dot)com> writes:
> Thinking unnecessary. Motion is progress. Here is a patch that uses
> this exact plan: pgport for the tables, broken out into a header file
> that is included in the building of libpgport. I have confirmed by
> objdump -t that multiple copies of the table are not included in the
> postgres binary and the bloat has not occurred.
Applied with minor adjustments; mainly, I cleaned up some additional
traces of the old way of building pg_resetxlog and pg_controldata.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Josh Berkus | 2012-02-29 01:26:48 | Re: 3rd Cluster Hackers Summit, May 15th in Ottawa |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2012-02-28 22:35:14 | Parameterized-path cost comparisons need some work |