| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | "'pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org'" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Vacuum and Transactions |
| Date: | 2001-07-06 18:45:46 |
| Message-ID: | 17754.994445146@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
>> In 7.2, VACUUM will not require an exclusive lock.
> Care to elaborate on that? How are you going to do it?
Uh, have you not been paying attention to pg-hackers for the
last two months?
I am assuming here that concurrent VACUUM will become the default
kind of vacuum, and the old style will be invoked by some other
syntax (VACUUM FULL ..., maybe).
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Mihai Gheorghiu | 2001-07-06 18:47:39 | Number of days |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2001-07-06 18:43:44 | Re: HUPing a database |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2001-07-06 18:49:37 | Re: Vacuum and Transactions |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2001-07-06 18:42:39 | Re: Vacuum and Transactions |