Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: blatantly a bug in the documentation

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, "A(dot) Kretschmer" <andreas(dot)kretschmer(at)schollglas(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: blatantly a bug in the documentation
Date: 2008-11-24 14:02:37
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> Dave Page wrote:
>> It might also be useful to create such a database at initdb time so
>> newbies have something interesting to look at right away.

> No, there is no need to clutter every installation in the world with 
> such a database. You could make it an addon module, or a pgfoundry project.

The whole thing strikes me as extreme overkill, not to mention a
misunderstanding of what an example is supposed to be for.  If we're
going to insist that every example in the docs work when
copied-and-pasted into an empty database, then simple and to-the-point
examples will be history.  Instead of one-liners we'll have clutter.

			regards, tom lane

In response to


pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2008-11-24 14:06:14
Subject: Re: literal limits in 8.3
Previous:From: Magnus HaganderDate: 2008-11-24 14:01:49
Subject: Re: blatantly a bug in the documentation

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group