Re: Strange behavior with polygon and NaN

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: gkokolatos(at)pm(dot)me, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Strange behavior with polygon and NaN
Date: 2020-11-21 22:33:53
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

I went ahead and pushed 0001 and 0003 (the latter in two parts), since
they didn't seem particularly controversial to me. Just to keep the
cfbot from whining, here's a rebased version of 0002.

regards, tom lane

Attachment Content-Type Size
v7-0002-fix-line_closept_point.patch text/x-diff 3.6 KB

In response to


Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2020-11-21 23:27:12 Re: [PATCH] Covering SPGiST index
Previous Message Peter Geoghegan 2020-11-21 21:55:57 Re: Different results between PostgreSQL and Oracle for "for update" statement