Re: No hash join across partitioned tables?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Kris Jurka <books(at)ejurka(dot)com>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: No hash join across partitioned tables?
Date: 2010-03-02 16:23:18
Message-ID: 17546.1267546998@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-performance

Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 7:03 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> Partially. There are stats now but autovacuum is not bright about
>> when to update them.

> Is that something you're planning to fix for 9.0? If not, we at least
> need to document what we intend for people to do about it.

I want to look at it, but I'm not sure whether the fix will be small
enough that we want to put it in during beta.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Grzegorz Jaśkiewicz 2010-03-02 16:27:14 Re: No hash join across partitioned tables?
Previous Message Tom Lane 2010-03-02 16:21:28 Re: USE_LIBXSLT in MSVC builds

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2010-03-02 16:23:22 Re: GiST index performance
Previous Message Robert Haas 2010-03-02 16:21:15 Re: GiST index performance