"Patrick Vachon" <kaleidelf(at)hotmail(dot)com> writes:
> Here what I found:
> http://www.science.uva.nl/pub/solaris/solaris2/Q5.2.html
Hmm ... that's suspicious, but it's talking about Solaris 2.5. Surely
Sun woulda fixed that problem by Solaris 8?
regards, tom lane