Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 4:28 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> You know, maybe we should stop holding our noses and do something about
>> this old gotcha. That type's not going away anytime soon, but could we
>> rename it to char1 or something like that? (With some sort of backward
>> compatibility hack, like a domain named "char".)
> domains are out, unless arrays of domains are addressed first.
[ raised eyebrow... ] You've got apps that depend on array of "char"?
regards, tom lane
In response to
pgsql-general by date
|Next:||From: Jeremy Harris||Date: 2009-02-03 23:28:20|
|Subject: Re: Pet Peeves?|
|Previous:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2009-02-03 23:14:05|
|Subject: Re: what's the deal with 8.3.6 tagged, but not released yet ? |