Re: Egroupware infolog query slow (includes query plan)

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Mark Stosberg <mark(at)summersault(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Egroupware infolog query slow (includes query plan)
Date: 2008-07-06 21:34:27
Message-ID: 17233.1215380067@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-sql

Mark Stosberg <mark(at)summersault(dot)com> writes:
> I'm not skilled enough at reading the "Explain Analzyze" output to
> understand what the primary problem is.

The problem is the repeated execution of the subquery in the SELECT
list; that's taking over 683 of the 686 seconds:

> SubPlan
> -> Aggregate (cost=2162.60..2162.61 rows=1
> width=0) (actual time=21.073..21.073 rows=1 loops=32424)
^^^^^^ ^^^^^

The current formulation of the query guarantees that you can't do better
than a nestloop join with "sub" on the inside, and that nestloop isn't
even indexed. See if you can convert it to a regular join instead of a
sub-select (probably with GROUP BY instead of DISTINCT).

Also, those LIKE conditions are just horrid: slow *and* unreadable.
Consider redesigning your data representation. Perhaps converting
info_responsible to an int array would be reasonable.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-sql by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message dipesh 2008-07-07 09:13:15 How to find space occupied by postgres on harddisk
Previous Message Mark Stosberg 2008-07-06 20:26:51 Re: Egroupware infolog query slow (includes query plan)