Re: page macros cleanup (ver 04)

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Zdenek Kotala <Zdenek(dot)Kotala(at)Sun(dot)COM>
Cc: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Pavan Deolasee <pavan(dot)deolasee(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: page macros cleanup (ver 04)
Date: 2008-07-21 20:16:13
Message-ID: 17231.1216671373@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches

Zdenek Kotala <Zdenek(dot)Kotala(at)Sun(dot)COM> writes:
> Thanks for applying patch. I think that hash index "upgradebility" is
> currently broken or it will be with new hash index improvement. But if
> I think about it it does not make sense to break compatibility by this
> patch first.

Right, my point exactly. Those necessarily-incompatible changes might
or might not ever get applied --- if they are, we can do cosmetic
cleanups afterwards.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2008-07-21 20:33:55 Re: [HACKERS] Hint Bits and Write I/O
Previous Message Simon Riggs 2008-07-21 20:08:11 Re: [HACKERS] Hint Bits and Write I/O