Re: What is happening on buildfarm member baiji?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Dave Page <dpage(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: What is happening on buildfarm member baiji?
Date: 2007-06-04 03:29:33
Message-ID: 1717.1180927773@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> writes:
> Given this, I propose we simply #ifdef out the SO_REUSEADDR on win32.
> Anybody see a problem with this?

> (A fairly good reference to read up on the options is at
> http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms740621.aspx

Hmm ... if accurate, that page says in words barely longer than one
syllable that Microsoft entirely misunderstands the intended meaning
of SO_REUSEADDR.

It looks like SO_EXCLUSIVEADDRUSE might be a bit closer to the standard
semantics; should we use that instead on Windoze?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2007-06-04 03:53:19 Re: ERROR: index row size
Previous Message Jeremy Drake 2007-06-04 03:22:30 Re: ERROR: index row size