Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: More pgindent follies

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: More pgindent follies
Date: 2001-05-23 19:45:27
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> I agree, but in a certain sense, we would have found those compilers
> already.  This is not new behavour as far as I know, and clearly this
> would throw a compiler error.

[ Digs around ... ]  OK, you're right, it's not new behavior; we have
instances of similarly-split comments at least back to REL6_5.  I guess
my fears of portability problems are unfounded.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2001-05-23 19:50:09
Subject: Re: Not released yet, but could someone take a quick peak ...
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2001-05-23 19:35:21
Subject: Re: select ... for update and inheritence

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group