Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 9:52 PM, Tom Lane<tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> I don't have time to look right now, but ISTM the original discussion
>> that led to making that patch had ideas about scenarios where it would
>> be faster.
> This is what I've been able to find on a quick look:
> Sounds like Kevin may want to try renaming some of his indices to
> produce intermingling...
Also, the followup to that message points out that the 8.4.0 code has a
potential O(N^2) dependency on the total number of TOC items in the
dump. So it might be interesting to check the behavior with very large
numbers of tables/indexes.
regards, tom lane
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Oleg Bartunov||Date: 2009-07-29 13:57:13|
|Subject: Re: Filtering dictionaries support and unaccent dictionary|
|Previous:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2009-07-29 13:47:14|
|Subject: Re: WIP: Deferrable unique constraints |