Re: [HACKERS] SRPM for 8.0.0 beta?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)dcc(dot)uchile(dot)cl>, Steve Bergman <steve(at)rueb(dot)com>, "Hackers (PostgreSQL)" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] SRPM for 8.0.0 beta?
Date: 2004-08-18 16:33:24
Message-ID: 1684.1092846804@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> writes:
> On that, note that I specifically removed jdbc and tcl options from the
> spec file because the 8.0.0 release notes said they were removed from
> the distribution. I suppose at lease jdbc should be put back? It didn't
> seem right to include the 7.4 jdbc jars in the 8.0 source rpm, and I
> wasn't sure where to get the equivalent of 8.0.0beta1 jdbc jar files (if
> such a thing even exists).

What I've done so far is just to grab the latest stable release from
jdbc.postgresql.org. Using jars as part of the SRPM is pretty ugly,
I agree. There are some other Red Hat folk who have promised to look
into getting JDBC built from source instead, but it's not high priority.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-admin by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2004-08-18 16:43:20 Re: [HACKERS] SRPM for 8.0.0 beta?
Previous Message Joe Conway 2004-08-18 16:21:17 Re: [HACKERS] SRPM for 8.0.0 beta?

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2004-08-18 16:43:20 Re: [HACKERS] SRPM for 8.0.0 beta?
Previous Message Joe Conway 2004-08-18 16:21:17 Re: [HACKERS] SRPM for 8.0.0 beta?

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2004-08-18 16:38:34 Re: 7.4.3 & 8.0.0beta1 + Solaris 9: default pg_hba.conf breaks
Previous Message Joe Conway 2004-08-18 16:21:17 Re: [HACKERS] SRPM for 8.0.0 beta?