Re: reducing the footprint of ScanKeyword (was Re: Large writable variables)

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: John Naylor <jcnaylor(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andrew Gierth <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk>, Joerg Sonnenberger <joerg(at)bec(dot)de>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: reducing the footprint of ScanKeyword (was Re: Large writable variables)
Date: 2019-01-06 05:04:29
Message-ID: 1661.1546751069@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

I wrote:
> I spent some time hacking on this today, and I think it's committable
> now, but I'm putting it back up in case anyone wants to have another
> look (and also so the cfbot can check it on Windows).

... and indeed, the cfbot doesn't like it. Here's v8, with the
missing addition to Mkvcbuild.pm.

regards, tom lane

Attachment Content-Type Size
offset-based-keyword-lookup-8.patch text/x-diff 72.8 KB

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Julien Rouhaud 2019-01-06 11:40:28 Re: Ordered Partitioned Table Scans
Previous Message Tom Lane 2019-01-06 03:48:51 Re: reducing the footprint of ScanKeyword (was Re: Large writable variables)