| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov> |
| Cc: | "Heikki Linnakangas" <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: BUG #5989: Assertion failure on UPDATE of big value |
| Date: | 2011-04-20 19:37:41 |
| Message-ID: | 16593.1303328261@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
"Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov> writes:
> If I'm reading this correctly, it would appear that nobody has
> updated anything to a TOASTed value in a build against HEAD in
> testing *anything* in the last two and a half months. And the
> regression tests don't include a single UPDATE to a TOASTed value
> anywhere. That seems like a significant code coverage deficiency.
> Attached is a patch to cure the latter of these. I'm submitting
> this separately since it seems a good idea regardless of what
> happens with the related SSI issue.
Hmm, is there much regression coverage for TOAST inserts or deletes
either?
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Kevin Grittner | 2011-04-20 19:39:54 | Re: BUG #5989: Assertion failure on UPDATE of big value |
| Previous Message | Kananda Silveira | 2011-04-20 19:22:42 | BUG #5991: Bug restore .backup |