Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Improving prep_buildtree used in VPATH builds

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Gurjeet Singh <singh(dot)gurjeet(at)gmail(dot)com>, PGSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Improving prep_buildtree used in VPATH builds
Date: 2010-09-27 17:21:39
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
> Excerpts from Gurjeet Singh's message of dom sep 26 22:15:59 -0400 2010:
>> Currently I am seeing a performance improvement of this script by only about
>> 500 ms; say 11.8 seconds vs. 11.3 secs. But I remember distinctly that
>> yesterday I was able to see an improvement of 11% on the same virtual
>> machine, averaged on multiple runs; 42 sec vs 37 sec. It might be the case
>> that the host OS or my Linux virtual machine were loaded at that time and
>> the filesystem could not cache enough inodes.

> Hmm.  On my otherwise idle desktop machine, I can't measure a difference.

Yeah, this seems like something that would have at best an
environment-specific effect.  I'm not convinced that it couldn't make
things worse in some cases ...

			regards, tom lane

In response to


pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Robert HaasDate: 2010-09-27 17:27:35
Subject: Re: PlaceHolderVars versus join ordering
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2010-09-27 17:15:40
Subject: PlaceHolderVars versus join ordering

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group