Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Crypto

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, PG Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Crypto
Date: 2009-09-19 16:33:36
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> writes:
> On Sat, Sep 19, 2009 at 11:50:35AM -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>> What benefit would we  gain from making general crypto part of the
>> core?

> People may wish to encrypt things in the database.

That is not an argument why it has to be in core rather than an add-on.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

  • Re: Crypto at 2009-09-19 16:17:19 from David Fetter


  • Re: Crypto at 2009-09-19 17:27:00 from Marcos Luis Ortiz Valmaseda

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2009-09-19 17:21:10
Subject: Standalone backends run StartupXLOG in an incorrect environment
Previous:From: Magnus HaganderDate: 2009-09-19 16:18:01
Subject: Re: updated hstore patch

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group