| From: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Scott Bailey <artacus(at)comcast(dot)net>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org Hackers" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Review: listagg aggregate |
| Date: | 2010-01-26 06:59:35 |
| Message-ID: | 162867791001252259r211b9c93l41ea3daa729d0079@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
2010/1/25 David E. Wheeler <david(at)kineticode(dot)com>:
> On Jan 25, 2010, at 6:12 AM, Pavel Stehule wrote:
>
>> I am not happy, I thing so we do bigger chaos then it is. But it
>> hasn't progress. So I agree with name string_agg. In this case isn't a
>> problem rename this function if somebody would.
>
> Could you not use CREATE AGGREGATE to create an alias named listagg if you needed it? Or are we limited to a single argument in that case?
we can, but without one common known name we will have a propriety name.
Pavel
>
> David
>
>
>
>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2010-01-26 07:03:29 | Re: tab completion for prepared transactions? |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2010-01-26 06:40:04 | Re: default_language |