2008/6/4 Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>:
> "Pavel Stehule" <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> I put fill value on end, because it is like default value:
>> array_set(array[2,2], 0);
> Huh? That's completely nonsensical ... where will you determine the
> type of the array, if you don't have a sample element?
it is nonsens in current postgres. But null array is castable to anyarray no?
> The fact that the fill value is determining the array type is why
> it seems important enough to put first.
I agree - first is most important parameter. But I am not sure, that
is it. size or value. An I am strong fixed on C, Intel notation where
destination is first and value is second.
> regards, tom lane
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Simon Riggs||Date: 2008-06-04 20:28:08|
|Subject: Re: Change lock requirements for adding a trigger|
|Previous:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2008-06-04 20:12:05|
|Subject: Re: Overhauling GUCS |