Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: vacuum locking

From: Rob Nagler <nagler(at)bivio(dot)biz>
To: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: vacuum locking
Date: 2003-10-24 22:04:39
Message-ID: 16281.41463.449000.639113@gargle.gargle.HOWL (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-performance
Stephen writes:
> I ran into the same problem with VACUUM on my Linux box. If you are running
> Linux, take a look at "elvtune" or read this post:

The default values were -r 64 -w 8192.  The article said this was
"optimal".  I just futzed with different values anywere from -w 128 -r
128 to -r 16 -w 8192.  None of these mattered much when vacuum is

This is a RAID1 box with two disks.  Even with vacuum and one other
postmaster running, it's still got to get a lot of blocks through the
I/O system.


In response to

pgsql-performance by date

Next:From: Rob NaglerDate: 2003-10-24 22:07:25
Subject: Re: vacuum locking
Previous:From: Richard JonesDate: 2003-10-24 21:06:10
Subject: Memcache

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group