Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: ISN was: Core Extensions relocation

From: Joshua Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Peter Geoghegan <peter(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Subject: Re: ISN was: Core Extensions relocation
Date: 2011-11-21 17:57:54
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> I don't see any of this reaching the level that it needs to be
> backpatched, so I think we have to accept that this will be 9.2-only
> change.

Agreed.  If users encounter issues with the prefix in the field, it will be easy enough for them to back-patch.  But we don't want to be responsible for it as a project.


In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2011-11-21 18:05:07
Subject: Re: psql \ir filename normalization
Previous:From: Pavan DeolaseeDate: 2011-11-21 17:38:13
Subject: Re: testing ProcArrayLock patches

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2018 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group