Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [PATCH] Magic block for modules

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>
Cc: pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Magic block for modules
Date: 2006-05-08 00:21:43
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-patches
Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> writes:
> This implements a proposal made last november:

Ah, good, I'd been meaning to do this.

> changes in any of the following:

> the size of 8 basic C types
> The compiler used (only brand, not version)

That seems way overkill to me.  FUNC_MAX_ARGS is good to check, but
most of those other things are noncritical for typical add-on modules.
In particular I strongly object to the check on compiler.  Some of us do
use systems where gcc and vendor compilers are supposed to interoperate
... and aren't all those Windows compilers supposed to, too?  AFAIK
it's considered the linker's job to prevent loading 32-bit code into
a 64-bit executable or vice versa, so I don't think we need to be
checking for common assumptions about sizeof(long).

> Currently, modules without a magic block are merely logged at LOG
> level. This needs some discussion though.

I'm pretty sure we had agreed that magic blocks should be required;
otherwise this check will accomplish little.

			regards, tom lane

In response to


pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2006-05-08 02:39:52
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Question on win32 semaphore simulation
Previous:From: Martijn van OosterhoutDate: 2006-05-07 21:17:05
Subject: [PATCH] Magic block for modules

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2006-05-08 02:20:17
Subject: Re: pgstat: remove delayed destroy / pipe:
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2006-05-08 00:11:17
Subject: Re: Page at a time index scan

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group