Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Pretty printed trigger in psql

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Takahiro Itagaki <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)oss(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Pretty printed trigger in psql
Date: 2010-01-14 05:52:10
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Takahiro Itagaki <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)oss(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> writes:
> Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> Is this patch reversed?  It seems so but the listed file timestamps
>> don't match that idea ...

> Sorry, I cannot understand what you mean...

The patch looks like it removes, rather than adds, your intended

			regards, tom lane

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Greg SmithDate: 2010-01-14 06:04:39
Subject: Re: [PATCH] remove redundant ownership checks
Previous:From: Takahiro ItagakiDate: 2010-01-14 05:30:33
Subject: Re: Pretty printed trigger in psql

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group