Re: [HACKERS] Linux.conf.au 2003 Report

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Christopher Kings-Lynne" <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>
Cc: "Hackers" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Advocacy" <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Linux.conf.au 2003 Report
Date: 2003-01-30 06:04:52
Message-ID: 15841.1043906692@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy pgsql-hackers

"Christopher Kings-Lynne" <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au> writes:
> Maybe we should create a new type 'inet6'???

I'd lean towards allowing the existing inet and cidr types to store both
v4 and v6 addresses, if at all possible. Is there a good motivation for
doing otherwise?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Gavin Sherry 2003-01-30 12:42:13 Re: [HACKERS] Linux.conf.au 2003 Report
Previous Message Christopher Kings-Lynne 2003-01-30 06:01:37 Re: [HACKERS] Linux.conf.au 2003 Report

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Magnus Naeslund(f) 2003-01-30 06:12:57 Re: v7.2.4 bundled ...
Previous Message Christopher Kings-Lynne 2003-01-30 06:01:37 Re: [HACKERS] Linux.conf.au 2003 Report