Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: COPY (query) TO file

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>
Cc: PFC <lists(at)peufeu(dot)com>, "Tino Wildenhain" <tino(at)wildenhain(dot)de>, "Mark Woodward" <pgsql(at)mohawksoft(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: COPY (query) TO file
Date: 2006-06-03 14:56:44
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu> writes:
> PFC <lists(at)peufeu(dot)com> writes:
>> MySQL already does this for INSERT :
>> INSERT INTO x (a,b) VALUES (1,2), (3,4), (5,6)...;

> Does MySQL really let you stream that? Trying to do syntax like that in
> Postgres wouldn't work because the parser would try to build up a parse tree
> for the whole statement before running the command.

A quick look at MySQL's grammar doesn't show any indication that they
don't build a full parse tree too.

The above syntax is SQL-standard, so we ought to support it sometime,
performance benefits or no.  I agree it might be tricky to avoid eating
an unreasonable amount of memory for a very long list in Postgres :-(

Supporting VALUES only in INSERT would be relatively trivial BTW,
but the spec actually thinks it should be allowed as a <table spec>
in FROM ...

			regards, tom lane

In response to


pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: PFCDate: 2006-06-03 14:59:29
Subject: Re: COPY (query) TO file
Previous:From: Jim NasbyDate: 2006-06-03 14:42:03
Subject: Re: 'CVS-Unknown' buildfarm failures?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2018 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group