|From:||Sergei Kornilov <sk(at)zsrv(dot)org>|
|Cc:||Andrew Gierth <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk>|
|Subject:||Re: pg_stat_statements vs. SELECT FOR UPDATE|
|Views:||Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email|
The following review has been posted through the commitfest application:
make installcheck-world: tested, passed
Implements feature: tested, passed
Spec compliant: not tested
Documentation: not tested
Patch is applied cleanly, compiles and pass check-world. Has tests and does not need documentation changes since old behavior was not documented
Well, I can not say something about code.
> SELECT * FROM pgss_a JOIN pgss_b ON pgss_b.a_id = pgss_a.id FOR UPDATE OF pgss_a, pgss_b; -- should not appear
This query is counted as second "SELECT * FROM pgss_a JOIN pgss_b ON pgss_b.a_id = pgss_a.id FOR UPDATE". I prefer a bit more verbose comment here. Firstly I was surprised by both questions "why should not appear?" and "where was the second query call?"
|Next Message||Thomas Munro||2019-03-12 13:20:29||Re: POC: Cleaning up orphaned files using undo logs|
|Previous Message||Michael Paquier||2019-03-12 12:44:03||Re: Offline enabling/disabling of data checksums|