From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Alex Pilosov <alex(at)pilosoft(dot)com> |
Cc: | Dave VanAuken <dave(at)hawk-systems(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: SHM ids (was running pgsql 7 under Jail'ed virtual machine on FreeBSD 4.2) |
Date: | 2001-01-05 23:44:41 |
Message-ID: | 15339.978738281@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-admin pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
I said:
> Alex Pilosov <alex(at)pilosoft(dot)com> writes:
>> I'd suggest you do this: add a global backend_shmid_offset in ipc.c,
>> initialized to current default, and an option to postgres to put a value
>> there.
> Don't waste your time. This issue is gone in current sources. See
> IpcMemoryCreate and IpcSemaphoreCreate in src/backend/storage/ipc/ipc.c.
Actually, now that I think about it, you might still have a problem if
a "jail" is what I think it is. The current code will step past an
existing shmem segment if it appears to be a non-Postgres memory segment
or if it appears to belong to another running postmaster. However, the
test to see if the segment owner appears to be alive is
/*
* If the creator PID is my own PID or does not belong to any
* extant process, it's safe to zap it.
*/
if (hdr->creatorPID != getpid())
{
if (kill(hdr->creatorPID, 0) == 0 ||
errno != ESRCH)
{
// segment belongs to a live postmaster, so continue
}
}
So the question for you is, what will happen if kill() is given a PID
belonging to a process that's in a different "jail"? Will it return
some kind of permission failure, or will it claim that there is no
such PID (ie, return ESRCH)? If the latter, we still have a problem ...
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alfonso Peniche | 2001-01-06 00:18:48 | ODBC 7.x for windows |
Previous Message | Alex Pilosov | 2001-01-05 23:06:55 | Re: SHM ids (was running pgsql 7 under Jail'ed virtual machine on FreeBSD 4.2) |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alfonso Peniche | 2001-01-06 00:18:48 | ODBC 7.x for windows |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2001-01-05 23:14:15 | Re: pg_dump return status.. |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2001-01-05 23:49:04 | Re: Re: Beta2 ... ? |
Previous Message | Lamar Owen | 2001-01-05 23:35:43 | Re: Re: Beta2 ... ? |