Re: SQL:2011 application time

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Paul Jungwirth <pj(at)illuminatedcomputing(dot)com>
Cc: Corey Huinker <corey(dot)huinker(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Jaime Casanova <jcasanov(at)systemguards(dot)com(dot)ec>
Subject: Re: SQL:2011 application time
Date: 2023-05-08 07:10:09
Message-ID: 152e4c2c-36b4-bdc0-1b62-e9f9e8b68adc@enterprisedb.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 03.05.23 23:02, Paul Jungwirth wrote:
> Thank you again for the review. Here is a patch with most of your
> feedback addressed. Sorry it has taken so long! These patches are
> rebased up to 1ab763fc22adc88e5d779817e7b42b25a9dd7c9e
> (May 3).

Here are a few small fixup patches to get your patch set compiling cleanly.

Also, it looks like the patches 0002, 0003, and 0004 are not split up
correctly. 0002 contains tests using the FOR PORTION OF syntax
introduced in 0003, and 0003 uses the function build_period_range() from
0004.

Attachment Content-Type Size
0001-fixup-Add-PERIODs.patch text/plain 1.4 KB
0002-fixup-Add-PERIODs.patch text/plain 1.1 KB
0003-fixup-Add-UPDATE-DELETE-FOR-PORTION-OF.patch text/plain 692 bytes

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Masahiko Sawada 2023-05-08 07:23:15 Subscription statistics are not dropped at DROP SUBSCRIPTION in some cases
Previous Message Amit Kapila 2023-05-08 06:33:48 Re: Perform streaming logical transactions by background workers and parallel apply