Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> writes:
> However, my personal preference is to treat the name of the database as
> a "bunch of bits" ie, don't consider it encoded at all.
That's essentially what we are doing as far as the StartupMessage is
concerned. Doesn't really solve the problem of post-startup accesses to
the shared catalogs, however.
regards, tom lane
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Albe Laurenz||Date: 2006-02-28 15:55:26|
|Subject: Re: new feature: LDAP database name resolution |
|Previous:||From: Kevin Grittner||Date: 2006-02-28 15:44:08|
|Subject: temporary indexes|