Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Missing array support

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>,Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>,PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Missing array support
Date: 2003-06-28 03:18:18
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-patches
Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> Joe Conway wrote:
>> Yeah, but isn't feature freeze July 1?

> Yes, but once the "feature" is in, you can adjust it if it isn't
> working.
> I am just pointing out that beating the system is a popular hacker
> passtime during beta.  :-)

It's just a matter of staking out what's considered an implemented
feature.  The ARRAY[] syntax is definitely in, so if it needs a few
adjustments around the edges to make it more spec-compliant, no one
will blink at doing that during beta.

If I were you I'd file this on the to-fix-later list and concentrate
on polymorphic aggregates during the next couple days.  If that's not
done by Tuesday it will be a tough sell to put in during beta.

			regards, tom lane

In response to


pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Bruno Wolff IIIDate: 2003-06-28 03:25:21
Subject: Re: Feature request: set planner flags on views
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2003-06-28 00:21:12
Subject: Re: Manual fixing of plpgsql_call_handler binary location -- good idea?

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Joe ConwayDate: 2003-06-28 03:32:22
Subject: Re: Missing array support
Previous:From: Nabil SayeghDate: 2003-06-27 23:40:47
Subject: Re: connectby_reverselookup()

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group