From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Roger Leigh <rleigh(at)codelibre(dot)net> |
Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, "Brad T(dot) Sliger" <brad(at)sliger(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Selena Deckelmann <selenamarie(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Roger Leigh <rleigh(at)debian(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Unicode UTF-8 table formatting for psql text output |
Date: | 2009-09-30 15:09:33 |
Message-ID: | 15196.1254323373@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Roger Leigh <rleigh(at)codelibre(dot)net> writes:
> The language in SUSv2 in fact explicitly states that this is
> allowed. In fact, I've seen documentation that some UNIX systems such
> as HPUX already do have a UTF-8 C locale as an option.
I don't argue with the concept of a C.UTF8 locale --- in fact I think
it sounds pretty useful. What I think is 100% broken is trying to make
C locale work that way. C locale is supposed to be the traditional
locale-ignorant, characters-are-bytes behavior.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2009-09-30 15:11:23 | Re: Unicode UTF-8 table formatting for psql text output |
Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2009-09-30 15:03:05 | Re: Unicode UTF-8 table formatting for psql text output |