Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Anything to be gained from a 'Postgres Filesystem'?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Steinar H(dot) Gunderson" <sgunderson(at)bigfoot(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Anything to be gained from a 'Postgres Filesystem'?
Date: 2004-10-21 14:20:55
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-performance
"Steinar H. Gunderson" <sgunderson(at)bigfoot(dot)com> writes:
> ... I have no idea how much you can improve over the "best"
> filesystems out there, but having two layers of journalling (both WAL _and_
> FS journalling) on top of each other don't make all that much sense to me.

Which is why setting the FS to journal metadata but not file contents is
often suggested as best practice for a PG-only filesystem.

			regards, tom lane

In response to


pgsql-performance by date

Next:From: george youngDate: 2004-10-21 14:22:37
Subject: Re: create index with substr function
Previous:From: Mark WongDate: 2004-10-21 13:54:58
Subject: Re: futex results with dbt-3

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group