Re: shared_buffers advice

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>, Pierre C <lists(at)peufeu(dot)com>, Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Dave Crooke <dcrooke(at)gmail(dot)com>, Paul McGarry <paul(at)paulmcgarry(dot)com>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: shared_buffers advice
Date: 2010-03-16 21:39:26
Message-ID: 15102.1268775566@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
> Maybe it would make more sense to try to reorder the fsync calls
> instead.

Reorder to what, though? You still have the problem that we don't know
much about the physical layout on-disk.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2010-03-16 21:49:03 Re: shared_buffers advice
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2010-03-16 21:30:54 Re: shared_buffers advice