Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Re: libpq++

From: Justin Banks <justinb(at)tricord(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: justinb(at)tricord(dot)com, Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-interfaces <pgsql-interfaces(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Re: libpq++
Date: 2001-05-03 21:05:43
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-interfaces
>>>>> "Tom" == Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:

  Tom> And what's wrong with a static class variable for that purpose?  The
  Tom> shmem segment looks like the hardest possible way to get the same
  Tom> result.

I'm kinda embarrased to say I didn't think of that, actually. That would only
mean exposing the default constructor of PgDatabase, so the derived class
could put off connecting indefinitely, right?


Justin Banks Tricord, Inc. justinb(at)tricord(dot)com
<Randomly selected signature here>

In response to

pgsql-interfaces by date

Next:From: Stephen DaviesDate: 2001-05-03 23:11:13
Subject: Re: Null values where they should not be...HELP Please!!
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2001-05-03 19:42:16
Subject: Re: Re: libpq++

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group