Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: beta3 Solaris 7 (SPARC) port report

From: Pete Forman <pete(dot)forman(at)westerngeco(dot)com>
To: "Ross J(dot) Reedstrom" <reedstrm(at)rice(dot)edu>
Cc: Frank Joerdens <frank(at)joerdens(dot)de>, prlw1(at)cam(dot)ac(dot)uk, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: beta3 Solaris 7 (SPARC) port report
Date: 2001-01-29 08:39:22
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-generalpgsql-hackers
Ross J. Reedstrom writes:
 > Hmm, multiple processors, and lots of IPC:
 > [snip]
 > Since it's just you and the sysadmin: any chance you could bring
 > the system up uniprocessor (I don't even know if this is _possible_
 > with Sun hardware, let alone how hard) and run the regressions some
 > more?  If that makes it go away, I'd say it pretty well points
 > straight into the Solaris kernel.

My observations of Solaris UNIX domain socket problems were on single
processor machines.
Pete Forman                 -./\.- Disclaimer: This post is originated
WesternGeco                   -./\.-  by myself and does not represent
pete(dot)forman(at)westerngeco(dot)com     -./\.-  opinion of Schlumberger, Baker  -./\.-  Hughes or their divisions.

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: domDate: 2001-01-29 10:39:03
Subject: Re: Ungraceful handling of fatal flex errors
Previous:From: Lamar OwenDate: 2001-01-29 07:50:03
Subject: Re: 7.1beta4 RPMs.

pgsql-general by date

Next:From: Martin TomesDate: 2001-01-29 09:29:42
Subject: Re: Too many open files! how do I fix on linux?
Previous:From: Rolf MuellerDate: 2001-01-29 07:48:38
Subject: transfer binary data to C-language function

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group