| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: enable_joinremoval |
| Date: | 2010-03-29 16:17:54 |
| Message-ID: | 14825.1269879474@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 12:03 PM, Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>> at the top of my list in this area for 9.1 is to track down the rumored
>> patch that exports information about the rejected plans considered and get
>> that comitted. That always seems what I want to look at for answering the
>> question "why this plan instead of what I was expecting?"
> Having looked at that patch, I am skeptical of it, but we can
> certainly take a fresh look.
The problem with this line of thought is that it imagines you can look
at worked-out alternative plans. You can't, because the planner doesn't
pursue rejected alternatives that far (and you'd not want to wait long
enough for it to do so...)
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Pavel Stehule | 2010-03-29 16:27:15 | psql: edit function, show function commands patch |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2010-03-29 16:10:16 | Re: enable_joinremoval |