| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Zeugswetter Andreas ADI SD" <Andreas(dot)Zeugswetter(at)s-itsolutions(dot)at> |
| Cc: | "Guillaume Smet" <guillaume(dot)smet(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Euler Taveira de Oliveira" <euler(at)timbira(dot)com>, "Simon Riggs" <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "Heikki Linnakangas" <heikki(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, "Neil Conway" <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>, "Gregory Stark" <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, "Jonah H(dot) Harris" <jonah(dot)harris(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [PATCHES] Proposed patch: synchronized_scanning GUCvariable |
| Date: | 2008-01-30 18:07:50 |
| Message-ID: | 14808.1201716470@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
"Zeugswetter Andreas ADI SD" <Andreas(dot)Zeugswetter(at)s-itsolutions(dot)at> writes:
> One more question. It would be possible that a session that turned off
> the synchronized_seqscans still be a pack leader for other later
> sessions.
> Do/should we consider that ?
Seems like a reasonable thing to consider ... for 8.4. I'm not willing
to go poking the syncscan code that much at this late point in the 8.3
cycle. (I'm not sure if it's been mentioned yet on -hackers, but the
current plan is to freeze 8.3.0 tomorrow evening.)
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2008-01-30 18:15:32 | Re: [PATCHES] Proposed patch: synchronized_scanning GUCvariable |
| Previous Message | Christopher Browne | 2008-01-30 17:55:55 | Will PostgreSQL get ported to CUDA? |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2008-01-30 18:15:32 | Re: [PATCHES] Proposed patch: synchronized_scanning GUCvariable |
| Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2008-01-30 17:46:19 | Truncate Triggers |