Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Autovacuum and invalid page header

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>
Cc: Kevin Grittner <kevin(dot)grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>, "pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Ireneusz Pluta <ipluta(at)wp(dot)pl>
Subject: Re: Autovacuum and invalid page header
Date: 2010-05-14 04:50:39
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-admin
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> writes:
> Yeah, maybe we should make it put the failed table at the end of the
> list, for the next run.  This is not simple to implement, if only
> because autovac workers don't have any way to persist state from one run
> to the next.  But this kind of thing causes enough problems that it's
> probably worth it.

> One thing to keep in mind, though, is that a persistent error in a
> single table is enough to keep a database's datfrozenxid from advancing,
> and thus shut down in case the wraparound horizon comes too close.  So
> perhaps what we need is more visibility into autovacuum problems.

+1 for the latter.  A recurrent vacuum failure is something that needs
to be dealt with ASAP, not partially-worked-around.

			regards, tom lane

In response to


pgsql-admin by date

Next:From: Marc G. FournierDate: 2010-05-14 05:29:39
Subject: Re: List traffic
Previous:From: Alvaro HerreraDate: 2010-05-14 04:40:41
Subject: Re: Autovacuum and invalid page header

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group