Elvis Pranskevichus <el(at)prans(dot)net> writes:
> On Wednesday, January 30, 2019 5:59:41 PM EST Tom Lane wrote:
>> I still found this pretty disjointed. After a bit of thought I
>> propose the attached reformulation, which has the callers just tell
>> the routines which types to allow explicitly, with the justification
>> comments living at the call sites instead of within the routines.
> This is a much better formulation, thank you!
OK, pushed.
regards, tom lane