Re: Modifying TOAST thresholds

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Chris Browne <cbbrowne(at)acm(dot)org>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Modifying TOAST thresholds
Date: 2007-04-27 14:47:48
Message-ID: 14751.1177685268@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Chris Browne <cbbrowne(at)acm(dot)org> writes:
> bruce(at)momjian(dot)us (Bruce Momjian) writes:
>> I have seen no one do peroformance testing of this, so it seems it
>> will have to wait for 8.4.

> I didn't have time...

> (e.g. - we've got a case where dropping the threshold to ~900 bytes
> would give us a big win for certain databases and tables.)

How do you know? Seems like you've got a readymade test case there.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dave Page 2007-04-27 16:08:00 Re: [Fwd: PGBuildfarm member narwhal Branch HEAD Status changed from OK to InstallCheck failure]
Previous Message Tom Lane 2007-04-27 14:46:27 Re: Fwd: How does the partitioned lock manager works?