Re: libpq 8.4 beta1: $PGHOST complains about missing root.crt

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Martin Pitt <mpitt(at)debian(dot)org>
Subject: Re: libpq 8.4 beta1: $PGHOST complains about missing root.crt
Date: 2009-04-10 20:13:31
Message-ID: 147.1239394411@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> On Friday 10 April 2009 22:50:02 Tom Lane wrote:
>> I do not believe it --- there is a significant difference
>> in the difficulty of passive listening and active spoofing.

> Sure, there is a difference. But what is it, and what percentage of users do
> you think are affected by it and can judge the difference?

I don't know, and I don't wish to be forcing a decision about it on
users.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kevin Grittner 2009-04-10 20:23:52 Re: Re: [BUGS] BUG #4027: backslash escapingnotdisabled inplpgsql
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2009-04-10 20:11:10 Re: libpq 8.4 beta1: $PGHOST complains about missing root.crt