| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | "pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: A thought: should we run pgindent now? |
| Date: | 2010-02-18 12:17:40 |
| Message-ID: | 1462871640306423663@unknownmsgid |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Feb 17, 2010, at 11:34 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Which leads me to the thought that rather than postponing running
> pgindent until late beta, maybe we should run it *now*, and get the
> bulk of its work done for the new code in 9.0. Then people would have
> a solid base to patch against, rather than having to expect a major
> merge hassle at the end of beta.
I was going to write an email proposing something along these lines,
too - so +1 from me.
...Robert
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2010-02-18 12:23:17 | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Introduce WAL records to log reuse of btree pages, allowing |
| Previous Message | Fujii Masao | 2010-02-18 11:37:18 | Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Make standby server continuously retry restoring the next WAL |