Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: A thought: should we run pgindent now?

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: A thought: should we run pgindent now?
Date: 2010-02-18 12:17:40
Message-ID: 1462871640306423663@unknownmsgid (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Feb 17, 2010, at 11:34 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Which leads me to the thought that rather than postponing running
> pgindent until late beta, maybe we should run it *now*, and get the
> bulk of its work done for the new code in 9.0.  Then people would have
> a solid base to patch against, rather than having to expect a major
> merge hassle at the end of beta.

I was going to write an email proposing  something along these lines,
too - so +1 from me.


In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Heikki LinnakangasDate: 2010-02-18 12:23:17
Subject: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Introduce WAL records to log reuse of btree pages, allowing
Previous:From: Fujii MasaoDate: 2010-02-18 11:37:18
Subject: Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Make standby server continuously retry restoring the next WAL

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group